Access to TAB's Audit Database (Members Only)

username

password

TAB's Truckside/ Mobile Audit Methodology

  1. The Methodology
  2. Testing
  3. Project Statement
  4. Audit Statement
  5. Cost

The Methodology

The methodology has three basic elements: GPS data on where the trucks have been, traffic data from the federal government's Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), and the model that calculates the estimates.

A GPS or Global Positioning System device is attached to the truck. The GPS receives and stores a signal from orbiting satellites, enabling the satellites to pinpoint the exact location of the vehicle in longitude and latitude. In our case these readings will be broken down so that every two minutes a record of where the truck has been is recorded. This allows an accurate tracing of the truck's steps as it proceeds throughout its daily business. The GPS files must be collected for each truck day in the advertiser's program and must be converted into "flat" DBF files for use in the system.

The HPMS is a huge national database that individual states must contribute roadway data to in order to be eligible for federal funding. It uses a linear referencing system to identify thousands of roadway segments, which is determined by changes in roadway characteristics. The linear referencing data is matched to the GPS via custom software custom software that works with ARCVIEW mapping software. ARCVIEW must be purchased by the user as the audit methodology works off of the ARCVIEW platform.

The model uses the GPS data to determine what route the truck has taken, broken down in two-minute segment's, overlays it on the HPMS road and traffic count data which has been fed into the ARCVIEW mapping software and assigns two minutes of that particular road segments traffic to each two minute interval the truck spends in that segment. The model assumes that 85% of the time the opposite side traffic is visible across the median. It calculates oncoming traffic and traffic traveling in the same direction separately. The model is conservative in that it does not give credit for night- time traffic, unless the advertising is backlit. It also does not count when a truck is stopped unless it moved in the last two minutes, since we cannot tell from the data whether the truck is stopped on the street or in a loading dock. The model does not, as yet, include pedestrians. We are working on that as a high priority for 2000.

The initial output of the system is an exposure report detailing exposure for each two-minute segment for each truck day. These are summarized in an Exposure Summary Report (attachment A). The report that is actually published by the user for the advertiser is the Project Statement, which I will discuss separately

go back to menu

Testing

Several tests were conducted to confirm various aspects of the model. The first test conducted was designed to ascertain the accuracy of the HPMS database. Over 350 miles of highways (urban and rural) were driven by Transearch to check the accuracy of the HPMS data.

During this phase of the testing it was determined that the data describing median type, which is a critical element in visibility, was not as detailed as we needed. It was decided that we would do a separate test to check what percentage of time the roads allowed clear visibility across the median. Roads were ridden in Atlanta, Chicago, Salt Lake City, Dallas, Los Angeles in addition to those in New York State. It was found that 85% of the time it was visible across the roadway.

Testing was also done to confirm the accuracy of the original estimates generated by the model and to develop an estimate of same direction traffic. This was done by mounting video cameras on a van and recording the traffic on 14 different routes representing 1400 miles and 150 trips with a mix of urban vs. rural streets and expressway vs. surface arterials. The number of vehicular impressions were counted and compared to what the model generated. The results were within about 10%, which our Audit Development Committee found acceptable. Also it was found that same side traffic represented approximately 7.5% of opposite direction traffic.

A test of the system using an actual advertising program was done in Sacramento, CA to check the mechanics of getting the data into the system and generating a report. Real GPS data from 10 trucks running for one month were entered into the system and estimates were generated based on that specific data. We wanted to look at the actual mechanics of getting the data into the system and generating a report. A similar test was done in Chicago on three trucks.

go back to menu

Project Statement

The Project Statement is a report that the user can publish for any advertiser program entered in the system. Which programs the user issues statements on are at the discretion of the user. Advertisers must request the Statements from the media company using the system. When a user publishes a Project Statement to a client that they would like to claim as audited the user would send a copy to TAB for TAB to stamp and sign. TAB keeps a copy of the statement and returns the original to the user. A sampling of each user's Statements are audited each year. The Statement must be stamped and signed by TAB to be considered part of the audit system. The advertiser can check, and will be encouraged to do so, with TAB to see if a Project Statement has been submitted for audit.

The Project Statement itself contains information on the specific client program it represents (i.e. number and type of trucks in program, number of days in program, market covered etc.) See Exhibit B for sample template. It also contains the number of gross impressions generated by the program separated by same side and opposite side traffic. It shows the number of contracted truck days (number of trucks in program X program length in days) vs. the number of verified truck days (the number of days the user can prove the trucks were on the road via GPS records or other verifiable sources. Verification via GPS records must be available for at least 90% of the truck days in the program for the Statement to be valid. It will report Average Daily Effective Circulation (DEC) per truck per verified truck days broken down by opposite versus same side as well as the combined total. DEC equates to how many exposures opportunities there are for a truck on an average day from the particular advertiser's program that the project statement represents.

go back to menu

Audit Statement

Once a year each user of the system will submit to an audit of the programs input into the system. This will be done on a sampling basis. Every program will have a chance to be picked.

The audit will involve re-running the GPS data for a particular program through TAB's master system to make sure the published numbers match those generated by the system. It will also involve the checking of actual driver log information, or similar documentation provided by the trucking company involved against the GPS records used for the report. It is very important that the user have an arrangement with the trucking companies they are using to have access to the driver log data.

Please refer to Exhibit C for a sample Audit Statement template. The Audit Statement will include a description of every program included in the audit and its gross impressions. It will also produce totaled numbers based on all programs in the audit for number of potential truck days, actual truck days, GPS verified truck days, as well as an total average DEC per truck, and the average DEC broken out by direction for all verified truck days.

Results will be reported to member agencies and advertisers via our website and published reports.

go back to menu

Cost

There is a one-time, up front cost of $22,500.00 to offset the initial development of the project and research needed to enhance the system, such as the development of a pedestrian methodology. Initial funding for the project was supplied by 3M Commercial Graphics and Fleet Advertising Media Group. They will be paid back from the up front cost.

The Development Fee can be made in two payments. Half due with the application and the other half due in 180 days.

Membership dues for 2000 will be assessed at $4,000.00. The audit cost is $725.00 per day.

The deliverables are the HPMS data and the custom software to run the system. Also included is technical support and yearly data upgrades.

An application is enclosed that you need to fill out and return with your check if you are interested in becoming part of this vital system.

go back to menu

| About TAB | What TAB Measures | The New Audit | Audit Operation Updates | Audit Database | FAQ | Membership Info | Board & Committees |
| Conferences/Publications | News | Home | Contact Us |

© Copyrighted Traffic Audit Bureau for Media Measurement, Inc.
271 Madison Avenue, Suite 1504, New York, NY 10016. Phone: 212/972-8075.
| Website by ODC